San Diego Based Qualcomm Reaches Settlement with Apple

In a surprise development, San Diego based Qualcomm and Apple have announced a settlement in their long standing patent dispute.

(CNS) Just as opening statements were beginning in San Diego federal court involving a long-standing patent dispute, tech giants Qualcomm, which is based in San Diego, and Apple announced the worldwide legal settlement Tuesday, along with a six- year licensing agreement.

"Qualcomm and Apple today announced an agreement to dismiss all litigation between the two companies worldwide,'' according to a joint statement issued by the companies. ``The settlement includes a payment from Apple to Qualcomm. The companies also have reached a six-year license agreement, effective as of Aapril 1, 2019, including a two-year option to extend, and a multiyear chip set supply agreement.''

Apple had been seeking billions of dollars over what it claims are exorbitant fees Qualcomm allegedly charged for the use of Qualcomm chips in iPhones, while Qualcomm alleged that Apple breached its licensing agreements to use Qualcomm's intellectual property by refusing to pay billions in fairly charged royalties.

Apple has long accused Qualcomm of charging excessive royalties for the licensed use of the San Diego based tech giant in iPhones, with Apple alleging that Qualcomm's licensing policies are monopolistic and allow it to force phone manufacturers into unfair agreements.

In its federal lawsuit in San Diego, Apple alleged that Qualcomm ``illegally double dips'' by forcing companies to pay for a license to use Qualcomm patents as well as purchasing the technology itself.

According to apple, this allowed Qualcomm to leverage ``its market power to extract exorbitant royalties'' and the company later only agrees to lower the royalty rates ``in exchange for additional anticompetitive advantages and restrictions on challenging Qualcomm's power, further solidifying its stranglehold on the industry.''

Apple also claimed that Qualcomm has withheld around $1 billion in rebates it was supposed to pay Apple as reimbursement for the patent royalties.

Qualcomm claimed that Apple was committing patent infringement by using Qualcomm's intellectual property related to thousands of patented technologies within iPhones without paying royalties.

Qualcomm alleged Apple breached its agreements ``for the express purpose of inflicting financial harm on Qualcomm and coercing it to accept unfair compensation for its intellectual property,'' according to Qualcomm's trial brief.

Qualcomm denied that its licensing practices were anti-competitive and stated that its policies ``have been standard in the cellular industry since its inception'' and its royalty rates ``have been accepted by hundreds of licensees.''

(Photo credit Getty Images)

title

Content Goes Here